Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Al Pacino: ‘I Was Broke. I Had $50 Million and Then I Had Nothing’

Al Pacino writes in his recently-published memoir “Sonny Boy” that he was forced to make dramatic career changes after losing all of his money due to a corrupt accountant who eventually served seven and a half years in prison for running a Ponzi scheme. The accountant mismanaged the Oscar winner’s funds, bringing Pacino’s savings from a staggering $50 million to zero dollars.

According to Pacino, it was in 2011 when he started “to get warnings that my accountant at the time, a guy who had lots of celebrity clients, was not to be trusted.” The actor was already paying “a ridiculous amount of money to rent some big fancy house in Beverly Hills,” and then he took his entire family on a trip to Europe where he flew various guests overseas “on a gorgeous Gulfstream 550” and “rented out a whole floor of the Dorchester hotel in London.”

When Pacino returned to his Hollywood home, he became suspicious after realizing his finances had not dramatically changed despite spending so much on vacation. “And I thought, It’s simple. It’s clear. I just know this. Time stopped. I am fucked,” he writes.

“I was broke. I had $50 million, and then I had nothing. I had property, but I didn’t have any money,” Pacino remembers about finally looking into his finances. “In this business, when you make $10 million dollars for a film, it’s not $10 million. Because after the lawyers, and the agents, and the publicist, and the government, it’s not $10 million, it’s $4.5 million in your pocket. But you’re living above that because you’re high on the hog. And that’s how you lose it. It’s very strange, the way it happens. The more money you make, the less you have.”

“The kind of money I was spending and where it was going was just a crazy montage of loss,” he adds. “The landscaper was getting $400,000 a year and, I don’t exaggerate these things. It just went on and on. Mind you, that was for landscaping at a house I didn’t even live in.”

Pacino was in his 70s when he learned he was broke, adding: “I wasn’t a young buck, and I was not going to be making the kind of money from acting in films that I had made before. The big paydays that I was used to just weren’t coming around anymore. The pendulum had swung, and I found it harder to find parts for myself.”

Before he went broke, Pacino was “was doing films if I thought I related to the part and felt I could bring something.” Examples that fit this career mentality were “Ocean’s 13” and “88 Minutes,” even if the latter title turned out to be “a disaster.” But once Pacino went broke, he had to throw out any regulations for his career and start accepting whatever roles offered up big money. That’s why he agreed to star in Adam Sandler’s notorious “Jack and Jill” and ended his ban against doing commercials. He shot a coffee advertisement with director Barry Levinson, for instance.

“‘Jack and Jill’ was the first film I made after I lost my money. To be honest, I did it because I didn’t have anything else,” Pacino writes. “Adam Sandler wanted me, and they paid me a lot for it. So I went out and did it, and it helped. I love Adam, he was wonderful to work with and has become a dear friend. He also just happens to be a great actor and a hell of a guy.”

Pacino also sold one of his two houses to make money and started charging to conduct seminars and colleges and universities, which he had rarely charged for prior.

“My seminars were another big find for me. In the past, I used to go to colleges all the time and talk to the kids there, just to get out there and perform for them, in a sense. I’d tell them a little bit about my life and have them ask me questions…I didn’t get paid for it. I just did it. Now that I was broke, I thought, ‘Why don’t we follow this up?’ There were more places I could go and do these seminars. Not necessarily universities. I knew there was a wider market for this. So I started traveling around. And I found that they worked. Audiences came because I still had popularity.”

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 68October 16, 2024 11:08 PM

See you at the next Hollywood autograph show!

by Anonymousreply 1October 16, 2024 11:28 AM

His definition of "nothing" and mine are quite different.

by Anonymousreply 2October 16, 2024 11:30 AM

I'm curious if he made back his $50,000,000 or not.

Hey, even if he is "reduced" to doing commercials and seminars, at least he has an ability to make large sums of money.

This is something that the average person is not able to do, so he should be grateful.

by Anonymousreply 3October 16, 2024 11:47 AM

it's frustrating seeing how many actors and celebs have the financial skills of a meth addled street beggar. austerity likers want you to believe we live in a meritocracy.

by Anonymousreply 4October 16, 2024 11:48 AM

When your financial advisor is married to a stripper (complete with the surname Passage), alarm bells should be ringing.

Seems it was Uma Thurman who first realised he was a scam artist.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 5October 16, 2024 12:09 PM

Can't these people just get a big firm to handle this stuff? Why trust some fly by night guy?

by Anonymousreply 6October 16, 2024 12:23 PM

[quote] Can't these people just get a big firm to handle this stuff? Why trust some fly by night guy?

The shady accountant probably promises them all sorts of "creative tax breaks" that the big firms won't do.

The problem with that, is obvious.

Someone willing to fudge the books in some ways, is willing to fudge the books in other ways.

by Anonymousreply 7October 16, 2024 12:30 PM

He had a lot of famous clients including Diane Sawyer and Sylvester Stallone. Never trust anyone married to a stripper or a porn star.

by Anonymousreply 8October 16, 2024 12:31 PM

r6 Greed. It'd the mindset of if one company gets you 5% returns and this guy gets you 10% then you're somehow making a 'loss' by not going with the shady guy

by Anonymousreply 9October 16, 2024 12:55 PM

And it took years for these stars to notice something funny about their finances? In this case and others?

All it says to me is that they have too much money, are dumb, or both. I think I'd at least take a look at the books occasionally.

by Anonymousreply 10October 16, 2024 12:55 PM

Riches to rags

by Anonymousreply 11October 16, 2024 1:00 PM

r10 How would that help when the books are fraudulent? Whenever someone got suspicious he took money out of someone else's bank account to pad the other.

Would you say the victims of Madoff were all dumb, too?

by Anonymousreply 12October 16, 2024 1:02 PM

[quote]In 2015, Starr sued fifty of his former clients, claiming they had not paid him for the genuine services he had performed for them, prior to his arrest.

Wow, the balls on that guy

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 13October 16, 2024 1:05 PM

All of this makes sense to me. I think that’s why actors “retire” and then come out of retirement later. The cost of keeping up their lifestyle and the people they employ is not something average people understand or relate to. It is also that they don’t want to live a more simple lifestyle. They aren’t going to be mowing their own lawns and shit.

by Anonymousreply 14October 16, 2024 1:06 PM

[quote] All it says to me is that they have too much money, are dumb, or both.

All of the above.

In the article, Pacino actually said:

[bold]“The kind of money I was spending and where it was going was just a crazy montage of loss,” he adds. “The landscaper was getting $400,000 a year and, I don’t exaggerate these things. It just went on and on. Mind you, that was for landscaping at a house I didn’t even live in.”[/bold]

That kind of wastefulness is just insane to me.

by Anonymousreply 15October 16, 2024 1:18 PM

This guy, Kenneth Starr, was not an accountant, he was an investment advisor. If Pacino can't tell the difference between an investment advisor and an accountant, no wonder he lost so much money.

by Anonymousreply 16October 16, 2024 1:21 PM

I do feel sorry for him, somewhat. BTW, he's not been saving on food.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 17October 16, 2024 1:30 PM

Another highly talented individual who obviously doesn't have the sense God gave a gnat.

by Anonymousreply 18October 16, 2024 1:35 PM

From Celebrity Net Worth:

[quote] What is Al Pacino's net worth and salary?

[quote] Al Pacino is an American Actor of both stage and screen who has a net worth of $40 million. Al Pacino's net worth should be much, much higher, but he is famously horrible with money. At his peak in the 1990s, Al was spending as much as $400,000 per month on his lifestyle. He was paying his landscaper $400,000 per year. He also lost a significant amount of money in the 2000s as a result of a bad accountant who subsequently went to jail.

[quote] According to his 2024 memoir, Al agreed to appear alongside Adam Sandler in the 2011 film "Jack and Jill," because at that time "had no more money." In the memoir, he also admits to taking the movies "Righteous Kill" (2008) and "88 Minutes" (2007) purely for the money.

[quote] Al has an open-ended deal with HBO, where he earns $10 million per HBO-exclusive movie. He has made three such movies to date. He earned $20 million in 2019 to star in Martin Scorcese's "The Irishman."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 19October 16, 2024 1:40 PM

Boo hoo

by Anonymousreply 20October 16, 2024 2:13 PM

How can you feel sorry for someone who lost that much money because of stupidity, but has the ability to go out, make crappy movies for a few more million over and over until he's back up at $50M?

There are actually people in America who are poor and can't simply decide to just lower their standards and become instant millionaires.

by Anonymousreply 21October 16, 2024 2:39 PM

I've thought about what I would do if I ever got this amount of money. For me, it's simple. I would hire two sets of accountants and investors - each would have equal authority over investment but also to AUDIT the other team. 50/50.

I used to work in financial crime in Manhattan years ago - the amount of celebrities that get screwed was higher than you think. Off the top of my head, we had Susan Lucci, Peter Falk, and several others come in.

Oh - and fuck this guy with the 7 year sentence that's actually going to be 3 years in minimum security at MOST.

It's always sickened me how little time white collar criminals get - it needs to be MUCH higher, just like physical violence.

Believe me, some of our victims (non celebrities) would rather have been assaulted or raped than to have their entire retirement taken away from them in their 60s.

by Anonymousreply 22October 16, 2024 3:03 PM

Does anyone remember the black man who did the flawless Judy Garland impression and trolled telemarketers

He told one of them that David Begelman took all his money

I’m too lazy to find it on YouTube

by Anonymousreply 23October 16, 2024 3:05 PM

Oh and let me say - fathering babies with young hoes in your 80's isn't a solid financial move either. Yep - Pacino became a father again a few months ago.

by Anonymousreply 24October 16, 2024 3:06 PM

I get that a majority of these people barely have a high school education and are virtually illiterate when it comes to finances.

But, I still cannot fathom ignoring basic commons sense sayings like "don't put all your eggs into one basket" and "a fool and his money are soon parted" or, the big one, "if it's too good to be true, it probably is."

The first thing I would do if I were a celebrity is squirrel away a chunk of money that no one else knew about into a index bond fund that reinvests dividends and forget about it. Even if you know nothing about finances, if you asked any competent financial advisor where you could hide away a rainy day fund, they'd suggest something of the sort.

The real problem is that people who know nothing about finances want to invest as if there were Warren Buffet and earn outsized returns - it's how so many people fell for Madoff. Sure, there is a place for higher risk investments for potentially higher returns. But, you're a fool if you put everything into such investments.

As for thieving accountants and business managers, spend time to figurer out what they're doing. Ask questions. Pay attention. If you don't understand what they're doing and how they're doing it, you're begging to get ripped off.

by Anonymousreply 25October 16, 2024 3:16 PM

Poor Glenn must be destitute too. She seems to be doing any part for money.

by Anonymousreply 26October 16, 2024 3:16 PM

Poor Al

by Anonymousreply 27October 16, 2024 3:22 PM

So why did he have a baby at 74. Make it make sense.

by Anonymousreply 28October 16, 2024 3:34 PM

[quote] This is something that the average person is not able to do, so he should be grateful.

In fairness he doesn’t sound ungrateful. He’s just talking about how his career changed.

by Anonymousreply 29October 16, 2024 3:37 PM

So many actors are so incompetent in regards to their money. Al Pacino as the article states. Johnny Deep and Nicholas Cage are two others yet for some reason ORCA I mean Oprah ( who is of average intelligence as are the others here) managed to turn her salary from the show and other Oprah branded stuff into a fortune of over three BILLION dollars. Someone invested her money extremely well.

by Anonymousreply 30October 16, 2024 3:42 PM

The latest baby mama has moved on and is now with Bill Maher. She’s making her way in the world one sucker at a time.

by Anonymousreply 31October 16, 2024 3:45 PM

You can tell Oprah is not of average intelligence. She built a fucking empire. Somebody who looks like Oprah with that built did not just get lucky.

by Anonymousreply 32October 16, 2024 3:46 PM

Oprah has said that she pays very close attention to her finances and personally signs every check that goes out.

"I need to know what my electric bill is. I think it keeps you grounded and aware of what's coming in and what's going out," she says. "I sit in on the boring tax meetings; I handle the money wiring. I have never liked surprises."

by Anonymousreply 33October 16, 2024 3:53 PM

[quote]I have never liked surprises

But I love bread.

by Anonymousreply 34October 16, 2024 3:59 PM

The memoir sounds good.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 35October 16, 2024 4:00 PM

This gives me such hope. I will contact Sotheby's to list one of my mud huts immediately. We shall eat again like Mafia kings!

by Anonymousreply 36October 16, 2024 4:05 PM

At least he wasn't stupid enough to buy a town in Georgia.

by Anonymousreply 37October 16, 2024 4:10 PM

My mother not rich did leave me and my musician brother a nice nest egg. If I even tried discussing how to invest it he’d go nuts. He hated any discussion of bonds, stocks etc. I think a lot of creative types share the same aversion.

by Anonymousreply 38October 16, 2024 4:12 PM

Did any of you bitches even stop and think about me? Saddled with twins from Al at 50 and my career was never all that. What do you think happened to my child support?

by Anonymousreply 39October 16, 2024 4:19 PM

R22, I have a lot of inherited money in bonds and securities, and have brokerage accounts split between Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley. They handle it. No “accountant” touches anything. I talk to the financial advisor not to the investors.

by Anonymousreply 40October 16, 2024 4:28 PM

You’re the investor, dumbshit.

by Anonymousreply 41October 16, 2024 4:35 PM

It sounded to me like Pacino knew he’d been financially reckless and owned up to the reasons for his subsequent choices to do just about any script he saw.

The fathering of children at his age, though. That makes me sick.

by Anonymousreply 42October 16, 2024 4:39 PM

[quote] This is something that the average person is not able to do, so he should be grateful.

He sounds grateful.

by Anonymousreply 43October 16, 2024 4:49 PM

[quote] All it says to me is that they have too much money, are dumb, or both. I think I'd at least take a look at the books occasionally.

The smart ones have a business manager AND an accountant -- the accountant is independent and audits the business manager.

by Anonymousreply 44October 16, 2024 4:53 PM

What r44 said. And always go with a reputable firm that's been around forever, like Merrill Lynch etc. These "independent" managers/investors are awful, you're just asking to get ripped off if you go with them.

by Anonymousreply 45October 16, 2024 4:56 PM

[quote] [R22], I have a lot of inherited money in bonds and securities, and have brokerage accounts split between Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley. They handle it. No “accountant” touches anything. I talk to the financial advisor not to the investors.

R40, what is "a lot" and are you single?

by Anonymousreply 46October 16, 2024 5:00 PM

84 years old and his book is only 384 pages!

by Anonymousreply 47October 16, 2024 5:01 PM

Still fathering children at his age? Those kids are going to be all kinds of fucked up and retarded. Old sperm tends to do that.

by Anonymousreply 48October 16, 2024 5:04 PM

R47=Barbra

by Anonymousreply 49October 16, 2024 5:07 PM

R48 - yeah - he got screwed by accountants yet he allowed himself to be screwed over by a young ho by fathering a child.

And yes - I'm calling this woman a ho - she knew EXACTLY what she was doing. She went after Mick Jagger and Clint Eastwood prior to this. She's a psycho bitch - she's not THAT hot.

How a woman gets herself entangled in with THREE major stars in their 80's and 90's - that's a fucking PLAN.

by Anonymousreply 50October 16, 2024 5:08 PM

I doubt Starr was actually acting as Pacino's accountant, r44, filing his tax forms, etc.

by Anonymousreply 51October 16, 2024 5:09 PM

I heard Pacino was into COCK🍆.

I believe I heard it here on the data lounge.

by Anonymousreply 52October 16, 2024 5:11 PM

[quote] Oprah has said that she pays very close attention to her finances and personally signs every check that goes out.

I think she said she signs a check if it's for $100,000 or more. But yeah, she seems smart with her money.

Old story, but she dated Roger Ebert, who told her to get syndication rights for her early talk show.

by Anonymousreply 53October 16, 2024 5:12 PM

[Quote] The problem with that, is obvious.

So is the superfluous comma.

by Anonymousreply 54October 16, 2024 5:20 PM

r54 pees sitting down and tears off a perfect square of toilet paper to dab the tip of his dick when he's done. And the toilet paper has to be PERFECTLY square.

by Anonymousreply 55October 16, 2024 5:22 PM

so the landscaper was getting nearly 8K a week for landscaping1 home! That's absurd!

by Anonymousreply 56October 16, 2024 5:25 PM

That’s right, r55. I do that.

And the added comma continues to be something a Trump supporter would mistakenly use in the sentence.

by Anonymousreply 57October 16, 2024 5:33 PM

R56 - no, the accountant was most likely saying it costs $400k - paying the landscaper probably $18k per year and pocketing the difference. $1500 per month for a large property is more than sufficient.

That was part of the accountant scam - trust me, there's no landscaper out there balling it out and getting away with charging $400k per year to a single client.

by Anonymousreply 58October 16, 2024 5:35 PM

[quote]And the added comma continues to be something a Trump supporter would mistakenly use in the sentence.

JFC get some help

by Anonymousreply 59October 16, 2024 6:59 PM

[quote] I have never liked surprises

But YOU get a car, and YOU get a car, and YOU get a car!

by Anonymousreply 60October 16, 2024 7:00 PM

[quote] the accountant was most likely saying it costs $400k - paying the landscaper probably $18k per year and pocketing the difference. $1500 per month for a large property is more than sufficient.

Thank you for clarifying that.

I honestly thought that Al was paying his landscaper $400,000 a year.

It never dawned on me that Al was saying it was an accounting scam.

by Anonymousreply 61October 16, 2024 7:01 PM

R52, when you read it here it's generally wishful thinking.

by Anonymousreply 62October 16, 2024 7:06 PM

R15, terrifying

by Anonymousreply 63October 16, 2024 7:08 PM

More money, more problems.

by Anonymousreply 64October 16, 2024 7:10 PM

Yeah, I thought he really was paying his landscaper $400,000. But, depending on what kind of property you have, you just might be paying her landscaper $400K per year.

by Anonymousreply 65October 16, 2024 8:22 PM

I would pay the landscaper $400,000 a year, ONLY if he was dicking me down good.

by Anonymousreply 66October 16, 2024 8:24 PM

[Quote] the accountant was most likely saying it costs $400k - paying the landscaper probably $18k per year and pocketing the difference. $1500 per month for a large property is more than sufficient.

and it never occurred to Al that that was a lot of money for landscaping. 🚩🚩🚩🚩

Al Pacino's Rolls-Royce: V12 Engine, 563HP, and $450,000

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 67October 16, 2024 8:34 PM

[quote]Still fathering children at his age?

Dummy Al didn't know he was being used. I have no sympathy for the geezer. Hope the kid turns out okay with that ancient sperm and a psycho mother.

by Anonymousreply 68October 16, 2024 11:08 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!